I just checked back at Seeking Michigan
to see if they had added any more early Michigan Census images to
their site since my previous and they had. I searched for “Smith”
in the collection and found a few surprises. But wait. . . before
you start doing your happy dance, like I did, let me temper your
enthusiasm. In many cases you will not be able to compare the people
in your family tree with a bunch of age check marks. Although the
forms used in many cases were the lovely census forms I described in
my previous post (More MI Census)
the enumerators ignored all of those columns and simply listed the
names (it appears) of men over 21. Some of the records for Washtenaw
county are poor (the right portion of the image is very dark so you
may not be able to find your people even if they are there). Most
other images I looked at were fairly good, however.
These records come from the holdings of
both the Library of Michigan,
and the Archives of Michigan.
Here are the records that have been
added since I posted about this earlier in the week and the type of
information you can expect to find. If I don't include a note after
the record available it means that the census form was used as
intended. It is possible that more counties and years are
represented in this database, but this is what I found in my search
for “Smith.” I'm not sure how common this name was throughout
the state, but there were a lot of Smiths in Eaton county. As of
April 4, here are all of the early census records available at
Seeking Michigan.
Branch, 1854, 1874 (Industry schedule
that lists names and occupations of men over 21)
Clinton, 1864
Eaton, 1845, 1854, 1874 (Heads of
households or men over 21 [not sure which] & occupations)
Houghton, 1864, 1874 (Heads of
households or men over 21 [not sure which] & occupations)
Kalamazoo, 1874 (Heads of households or
men over 21 [not sure which] & occupations)
Lenawee, 1845
Sanilac, 1864
St. Joseph, 1845
Washtenaw, 1827 (in some, but not all,
cases the column headings were missing, so look for images from the
same year), 1845 (Names of white males over 21), 1854 (Names of males
over 21)
It looks like some of these records,
1874 for at least some counties and perhaps other years as well, may
have been transcribed from another record or list. While examining
an 1874 record for Houghton county I noticed that each name was
numbered, but the first name on the page was not number one. Then
mid-way down the page I saw “P16” and the numbers started from
one. I can't think of a simpler explanation than that this list was
compiled from another record, though don't quote me on that.
When you begin looking for your kin,
remember that Seeking Michigan does not do fuzzy searches. Only
exact matches will turn up. So, be prepared to search by first name
and county if at first you don't find what you are expecting. That's
what I had to do, but it paid off. Now, if only I could go back in
time to give those enumerators a piece of my mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment