I'm always excited when I discover a
reference to one of my people in an old newspaper. Whether I learn
something good or bad, every little tidbit teaches me something about
those long dead relatives that I might not be able to find out any
other way.
This makes me wonder what new resources
genealogists a hundred years from now will have to replace the local
newspaper. While some places still have a locally produced paper
that focuses on area residents, businesses and events, other places
are seeing this vanish. My mother has complained to me for at least
a year that the Kalamazoo Gazette has less and less local coverage.
I know some Kalamazoo news stories now
appear online, but I suspect that things that may have appeared in
the print paper wouldn't be deemed important enough to end up in
cyberspace. Of course, as Kalamazoo increased in population it
reached a point where there was less interaction among members of the
community. As a consequence, the items that appeared in the
Kalamazoo Gazette over a hundred years ago like Mrs. Smith visiting
her daughter in St. Louis, for example, understandably disappeared.
I'm sure that in this digital age,
traces of our lives will still be around for our descendents. Maybe
a database of old Facebook or Twitter posts, YouTube videos or even
our browsing history will provide a look into our lives. Will these
sources provide more or less information about us? In some ways, it
could be both, but when we all publish information about ourselves it
is likely biased. Do you know anyone who would post something really
negative about themselves? Future generations may gain in the
quantity of information available about us, but they may lose any
objectivity (or at least willingness to publish the negative) that
old newspapers provide us about our ancestors. Only time will tell
for certain.
No comments:
Post a Comment