Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Groundbreaking for WMU Archives

You can expect to see some heavy equipment rumbling along Oakland drive starting next week. The groundbreaking for the new Legacy Collections Center is set for Thursday, July 19 at 10:30 a.m. and site preparations will begin the week of July 23rd. The footings for the 16,000 sq. ft., $8.3 million building will be poured during August. If everything goes according to schedule, the building will be closed in by winter and opened to the public in the summer of 2013. [1]

The Legacy Collections Center will house material from the WMU Archives and Regional History Collections, currently located in East Hall, in addition to overflow items from the University Libraries. The WMU Archives' documents currently located off-site will also be transferred into the Legacy Collections Center. In total, the new building is expected to hold more than 28,000 cubic feet of materials. The two-story storage area will be equipped with 30-foot tall compact shelving. [1]

The reading room in the new facility will include tables and seating for 24 as well as 1250 linear feet of shelving. This space can also be converted into a 72-seat space suitable for lectures. [1]

The East Hall location is visited annually by more than 1800 people interested in conducting genealogical and historical research. With a new climate-controlled facility and “ample public parking just steps away” I can only imagine that traffic will increase. [1] In addition, having all of the materials located in a single location will make things easier for both staff and patrons who will no longer have to wait days for items to be retrieved from off-site.

Amid the excitement over the new building, the staff of the WMU Archives has been quite busy lately. Packing began within a short time of the announcement of the new facility, even as they anticipated the arrival of documents from the Kalamazoo Gazette archive. Six truckloads and three days were required to transport the boxes of photos, negatives, clippings, bound newspapers, etc. to their new, albeit temporary, home. The cataloging of this vast collection began almost as soon as it arrived. Curator, Lynn Houghton, believes that the newspaper clippings will become available to the public sometime in the fall term. This collection contains “articles about individuals, events and organizations,” spanning the 1930s to the 1990s. [2]
For more information on the acquisition of the Kalamazoo Gazette archives, see my post:  WMU Archives' Big News

  1. Roland, Cheryl. WMU to break ground for Legacy collections building. 7-12-2012. WMU news. 
  2. Davis, Paula M. WMU preparing Kalamazoo newspaper archive for public use. 7-12-2012. WMU news. 

Friday, July 13, 2012

Woo Hoo! 1940 Michigan Census Index Released

I just discovered a little while ago that Ancestry.com has just released their index for the 1940 census for Michigan.  I immediately began searching for my people.  I found some of them, but a few still elude me, like my grandma's sister and her killer.  I admit that Salpatrick is not a common name and is therefore prone to transcription errors, but no matter how I search I can't find him yet.  While searching for Joseph Salpatrick I looked at another record on which the wife's name was transcribed as "Simmons" when it very clearly said "Suzanne."  I know I try to be careful in my indexing so I can only hope I will have better luck when the next Michigan index makes its debut.

FamilySearch's indexing of Michigan currently stands at 55% so it looks like I'll need to wait a little longer.  Just an interesting note about Michigan's 1940 population, it seems to me that a LOT of Michigan's population lived in the Detroit area.  Indexing has progressed alphabetically by county and I have been working on Washtenaw county lately.  It looks like I'll spend the rest of the indexing period deciphering names in Wayne county. 

To begin searching Ancestry's 1940 census records for free (through the end of 2013) click here.

As of September 2012, the 1940 census index for all states is also available at Family Search.  Randy Seaver of GeneaMusings did a few comparisons of the indexes at Ancestry.com vs. FamilySearch and found that in general, the FamilySearch index seemed to be better.  That is to say that his interpretation of the names he compared (and I concur) was in agreement with that transcribed by the FamilySearch indexers more often than the Ancestry indexers.  Whether the transcribed names are accurate, spelled the way those who were enumerated spell them, is anyone's guess, however.

The bottom line is that if you have been using the Ancestry index and have not found some of your people you should try the FamilySearch index and see if you have better luck there.  Maybe you'll get lucky!    

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Michigan State Census Records

I have good news and bad news. The good news is that Michigan conducted its own population census about every ten years during the latter half of the 19th century. The bad news is that most of these records were either destroyed or have vanished. However, depending on where your ancestors lived you may be able to find some of these records for your family.

The first time Michigan attempted to enumerate its inhabitants was in 1827, before statehood, but very few of the early records still exist. With a few exceptions, the ones you are most likely to find are for the years 1845 (head of household only, transcription available at www.Ancestry.com), 1884 and 1894 (transcription available at www.familysearch.org). And now, thanks to Seeking Michigan you can find images for existing state censuses from 1827 to 1894 on their website.  Their website lists which years are available by county.

The Library of Michigan holds many of these state census records. Coverage is spotty so you will definitely want to go to this website to see which records exist for which counties.

For Kalamazoo county the records available at the Library of Michigan are 1837 (abstract of records, with an index), 1874 (no index), 1884 (incomplete, no index), 1894 (no index). The Kalamazoo Valley Genealogical Society has 1884 census pages for Kalamazoo county available for Pavilion, Portage, Prairie Ronde, Ross, Schoolcraft, Texas and Wakeshma townships (I believe the records for the rest of the county are missing). These records can be found by searching the KVGS database.

The WMU Archives has state census records for Kalamazoo county (1837, 1884, 1894), Ottawa county (1884) and St. Joseph county (1845, 1884, 1894). The Van Buren District Library also has some state census records: Allegan (1894, incomplete), Kalamazoo (1884, Pavilion through Wakeshma), St. Joseph (1884 or 1894) and Van Buren (1845).

If you have military men in your tree who may have served in the Civil War (or possibly Mexican or Indian wars) you should also check the 1883 census of pensioners. Note that only men who were receiving a pension in 1883 are on the list. Some veterans may not have begun receiving benefits until later. If that is the case, you can look in the 1890 union veterans/widows schedule, which you can find at Ancestry.com.

It is unfortunate that many of the state census records no longer exist, but you may get lucky and find them in one that remains. Why bother looking if you already have your family pegged in the US Federal census? Don't underestimate the power of your ancestors to surprise you? Some of them moved around quite a bit and you may be able to track them to a new location with additional records you can pursue. Another good reason is because you may find a child who was born and died between federal censuses. You never know what you might find, but you'll certainly never find anything unless you turn over that stone and look.

Fortunately, the fine people at Seeking Michigan have scanned the existing census records and have made them available on their website. 

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Kalamazoo US GenWeb site


Where should you turn for a wide range of Kalamazoo-related information? To the Kalamazoo County US GenWeb site. For those who are unfamiliar with the USGenWeb, it is an all volunteer project. As a result, each state and county site is arranged differently. In addition, the type and number of records available vary by county. The Kalamazoo site has a little bit of everything so you are sure to find something helpful.

Some information is available here, while some is available via links to other sites. Among other things, you will find information on or links to:
Census records
Celery
Cemeteries
Family webpages, just a few
Funeral homes with addresses and phone numbers
County history, numerous articles on various topics
Vital records (some) with links to more
Links to military information
Some obits
Photos in various categories

My favorite part of the website without a doubt is the history section. There are several topics listed, but in many cases clicking on a particular one leads to several more. Articles include ones on early life in Kalamazoo county, Indians in Kalamazoo, the county poor farm, the Dutch, railroads and much more. I can't tell you how many times I have Googled something and been directed to an article on the Kalamazoo GenWeb site.

As this is an all volunteer effort you'll find a patch-work quilt of information here. To make it easier to find a particular surname you can take advantage of the search feature. You can search just the Kalamazoo county page or all of the Michigan GenWeb.

After you are done perusing the Kalamazoo county page, you may want to look at the Michigan GenWeb site as well. If you are really lucky you may just find a rescued family treasure at Michigan's Orphan Artifacts.  You can also visit the Michigan Tombstone Photo/Transcription Project to see if your relatives are represented (select a county and then a cemetery to get started).

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Kazoo celebrates the Centennial, 1876


The day began with a bang, literally. “The booming of cannon, the firing of musketry, of musketry of small guns and fire-crackers, the ringing of bells, sounding of whistles” awakened anyone attempting to sleep in. The village swelled as teams and trains brought thousands from outside the village to attend the day's festivities.

The town was painted red, white and blue with streamers, bunting draped from windows and flags waving from both homes and businesses. “Some people decorated their families, after using up all other space, and centennial babies were not the least patriotic part of this city.” “Miss DeYoe and Miss Chase, dressed as goddesses of liberty,” were “especially charming, graceful and memorable” as “they waived [sic] their pretty flags while the procession passed by.”

The procession itself, was 1.25 miles long and was more than just a Kalamazoo affair as attested to by the number of groups from surrounding communities. It was led by Crossett's Cornet Band of Constantine, followed by the Kalamazoo Light Guard, the Centreville Cadets, the German Workingmen's Benevolent Association, the Holland Workingmen's Association and St. Augustine's Benevolent Association. The Peninsular Commandery, the Three Rivers Commandery and the Odd Fellows marched next. Then came many companies of Firemen: Eurekas, Vigilants, Victories, Snails (from Paw Paw), the Asylum Fire Guard and the Hook & Ladder truck. A carriage drew Dr. Hitchcock and Mrs. Cameron dressed as George and Martha Washington followed by a terraced “chariot, with Goddess of Liberty, and Ladies representing” all 37 states in the union. Guests and village officers came next. The Kalamazoo Cornet Band and the Kalamazoo County Cavalry preceded the old stage coach. Then the trade wagons passed, decked out to display their wares, including millinery, tea, knitted goods, agricultural implements, carriages, sewing machines, handles, ice wagons, musical instruments and even carriages of the Forepaugh Circus and Menagerie. “It was a noisy affair.” Organized Granges and citizens in carriages brought up the rear.

The oration was given by Gen. Isaac Sherwood. 100 years ago, America was “a country without credit, without allies and without a flag. . . The empire of today, stretching from ocean to ocean, was not even a prophesy to the most hopeful of the brave spirits who signed the Declaration. Yet stripped of its prophetic spirit, the spectacle is no less grand – a handful of scattered colonists, surrounded by hostile savages, harassed by tory taunts and sneers, rising up without arms, without money, and unschooled in war, to confront and defy the leading power of the earth.” It certainly was a bold move to thumb their noses at Britain.

After describing some of the fathers of the revolution, including Washington, of course, Patrick Henry, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton and others, Sherwood continued. “Hallowed be the memory of men like these! Would that their names, every one, were cut in a mountain of granite, under whose sacred shadows as the centuries roll away, the children of the nations might gather, to write anew their noble epitaphs, and emblazon them with the unutterable glory of their achievements!” I think he would be happy to see that Washington and Jefferson were memorialized years hence on Mount Rushmore.

Sherwood made sure to mention that the Revolution was not a simple, glorious victory, something too quickly forgotten as the years passed. He said, “Let us never forget the Continental army. We must remember that science and organized human charities, had not yet appeared to ameliorate the horrors of war. No benign sanitary commission followed close upon Washington's bare-foot soldiers. Blessed anesthetics brought no relief to the terrors of amputation. No rail roads bore away the weary convalescents to quiet retreats. No daily mails carried words of sweet consolation from loved ones at home. No telegraphs bore swift messages – speaking by seconds, from heart to heart.”

“But we must hurry over the dire disasters that followed the American cause. Let us turn our eyes from Washington's depleted army, thinned out by desertion and the dread casualties of disease and battle. We can cast but a pitying glance at that ragged remnant of any army that sways and falls on the floating ice of the Delaware; that fixes its cold hungry trip on the desperate Hessians of the British Dragoons. We must pass over the perils and privations, the ghastly sufferings and sickening horrors of Valley Forge. Let us turn back from the bleak valleys, whose snow-clad roads are stained for eight long miles with the blood of Washington's perishing veterans. Let us pass by the wild-eyed starving regiments that have taken up their weary march to wrest redress from a bankrupt nation and a forgetful Congress. Let us leave the cruel price of our liberties and turn our glad eyes to the fruits the century has gathered.” This conflict lasted eight and a half years from when “the first American blood reddened the fields of Lexington and Concord” to “when Washington resigned his sword at Annapolis.” Sherwood then went on to describe how the nation had changed, in population, in territory, in equality for all men (at least on paper) and in technology.

Following this oration, the crowds dispersed until the afternoon's historical address by Foster Pratt. In addition to giving a history of the territory and state of Michigan he also gave a brief description of each settlement in the county as well as some of the early settlers. When he was through the assembly again broke up until the commencement of the fireworks.

The fireworks consisted of no fewer than thirty-three different displays. Some were stationary pieces, but I wonder if more oohs and aahs were elicited by the bombs bursting in mid-air. In addition, colored rockets, stars, serpents and gold rain delighted the spectators. Meteor rockets, silver shower batteries, parachute rockets and many other pyrotechnics wowed those in attendance before the satisfied crowds made their ways home.

After all of the hoopla surrounding the Centennial (and I'm not saying they shouldn't have been proud to reach that milestone), Americans were probably feeling pretty cocky. However, unbeknownst to those in the east, Custer's troops had been routed days before at the Little Bighorn. The victorious Indians may have wished rather than hoped that that battle could be the start of their own Independence Day. But that was not to be, though their struggle wouldn't be finally over until the massacre of Indians at Wounded Knee in the waning days of 1890. As for Kalamazooans, the report from the west didn't appear in the Telegraph until after the Centennial festivities were concluded, making the front page on July 6, 1876.


Kalamazoo Daily Telegraph. 7-5-1876

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Husband, Schmusband: Divorce Records

Some of the more interesting records I have come across in my genealogy research are divorce records. By “interesting,” I mean juicy. Of the ten or so divorce records I have examined, all but one of them included some pretty “interesting” reading. There was the wife who “did not perform her marital duties,” nudge, nudge, wink, wink. There were many accusations that husbands and wives were carrying on with other people, if you know what I mean. I quote from one such case in which the husband stated that his wife "disregarding the solemnity of the marriage relations. . . indulged in violent sallies of passion."  There were even a few in which the husbands were accused of occasionally being physically abusive.


I should note that the records I have perused encompass the first 25 years or so of the 20th century. Divorce was becoming more common, but it was still difficult to obtain a divorce in those days and some states had stricter laws than others. Grounds for divorce at the time were limited and included cruelty and abandonment. No-fault divorce was only introduced in 1970, first appearing in California. Therefore, it is important to remember that some claims may have been exaggerated to increase the odds of obtaining the divorce.

My family, not to be left out of a current trend, jumped on the bandwagon. Divorce seems to have been a way of life for one group of sisters in my tree. Between the three of them they married a total of twelve times and divorced eight times (another husband died and one deserted). One of these records even cleared up the mystery of why I could not find one of these women in the 1900 census. While the divorce complaint itself contained nothing to tell me why the marriage broke up (she just moved out), it did include the name my relative married under. It was time to create a new spouse in my family tree and hunt her down in the census (success at last).

The winner for most husbands in the shortest period of time goes to Ada Wallace who married five times in total. She seems to have gone through husbands like a snake sheds its skin. She married for the first time when she was just fourteen to a man 29 years her senior, Charles Hoard. Five children and 15 years later she apparently left her husband. Unfortunately, only the final divorce decrees exist for this time period in Branch county, Michigan so I don't know the details. Next she married George Alger to whom she remained married for 4.5 years. Their divorce records indicated that her husband, George, periodically went away for days at a time. When he did, Ada sometimes went out dancing (all night) with Charley Carr. Barely a month after the ink had dried on her divorce papers Ada married husband #3, who surprisingly, (to me, at least) was not Charles Carr, but Henry Miner. Within six months he was also history. A year and a half later she married husband #4 and again the marriage lasted about six months before the court approved her fourth divorce. Again, Ada had been seeing Charley Carr, who even spent the night (when her husband was gone) according to the landlady. A year later she finally married Charles Carr, and to her credit, remained married to him for thirty-four years until his death. I can't help but wonder why she married husband #3 (who was not mentioned in the divorce records with George Alger) or even husband #4 if she was frequently going dancing with Charley. Was she trying to make him jealous? Or at ten years her junior did she think he was just too young to marry? I'll probably never know.

One question that might come to mind after finding so many divorces is why some of these women married so often. It is easy to snicker, but it is useful to remember that although times were changing, women still didn't have many options. These probably included moving in with a relative and/or getting a job, becoming a domestic servant or getting remarried.

So, now that I have piqued your interest, where can you find divorce records for counties in southwest Michigan?

Records can be found at:

WMU Archives: chancery records (which include divorces) for Kalamazoo and many neighboring counties which may include: Allegan, Barry, Berrien, Branch, Calhoun, Cass, Kalamazoo, Kent, Muskegon, Ottawa, St. Joseph, and Van Buren . To make sure they have the records covering the county and time period of interest I recommend contacting them to ask before planning a visit.

Van Buren District Library: Allegan, Cass and Van Buren (on microfilm)

Kalamazoo county court house (201 W. Kalamazoo Ave, Kalamazoo, MI): chancery records starting about 1934 (earlier records are at the WMU archives).  For a practical guide to viewing records here (what's onsite, copy costs, etc.) be sure to read my post about doing research at the court house.

Your first step will be to consult the index (usually on microfilm). Be sure to select the roll with the year range in which you believe the divorce occurred. While indexes may be organized differently, the ones I have seen (Kalamazoo county) are organized as follows. For each initial letter of a surname there are many pages broken down into names beginning with the same two or three letters (e.g. Gary, Gardner, Garson, etc.). I advise starting in the appropriate section, but don't despair if you don't find the record you are looking for. I have frequently seen names entered in the wrong section so you may want to peruse all pages for that initial if you aren't already woozy from staring at microfilm for too long. If all else fails check a different year range or a different county.

Once you have identified the record, be sure to take note of the item number or any other information in the index. The last thing you want to do is hunt for the entry again. While you are already there, be sure to note any other court cases pertaining to your family. You never know what you might uncover. Armed with this information you can select the appropriate roll of microfilm and scroll through the records until you find the correct case number. If you are lucky the file will include both the initial complaint as well as a cross bill (so you can read both sides of the story). While a divorce is probably never fun it can make for interesting reading and above all, teach you more about your relative's life and character.

If you would like to know more about divorce around the turn of the century, including acceptable grounds, you may want to read The Rise of Divorce in Michigan.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

More Newspapers Online at the KPL!

Since I first wrote about the Kalamazoo Telegraph coming online at the Kalamazoo Public Library website, more digitization has been completed. The year range of the Telegraph now extends into the 20th century. In addition, some new titles have been added. As of late June, 2012 the following newspapers can be searched at: http://www.kpl.gov/local-history/regional-publications/.


Published with generous permission of the Kalamazoo Public Library

Kalamazoo Daily Telegraph (1868-1901)
Kalamazoo Saturday Telegraph (1893-1909)
Kalamazoo Evening Telegraph (1901-1912)
Allegan County Record (1869-1871)
Otsego Union (1897-1922)
The Weekly Union (1875-1888)
The Progressive Herald (1912-1913)

If you have not yet searched this database and would like a few pointers please see my original post on the subject. (Kalamazoo Telegraph is Online) For those who have searched here, I haven't noticed any differences. Unfortunately, you will still need to sort through the irrelevant text in the search results to determine if it is a good hit.

There's not much more to say on the subject so I'll let you get on with your research and I'll see what else I can dig up.